E-ISSN 2231-3206 | ISSN 2320-4672
 

Original Research 


Comparison of platelet count by peripheral smear method and automated method in pregnant women

Anitha K, Inderraj Itagi, Vijayanath Itagi.

Cited by (1)

Abstract
Background: Platelet count is an important investigation done in pregnant women. Platelet count is routinely done by automated method. The automated cell counters are not available at all hospital setups especially in rural side. Platelets can also be estimated from the peripheral smears, which can be easily done at any set up.

Aims & Objective: This study was conducted to compare the platelet estimation by peripheral smear method and automated method.

Materials and Methods: Platelet estimation was done in 50 normal pregnant women by stained peripheral smear and automated method. Platelet counts were expressed in Mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was done by student’s t test.

Results: Platelet counts were 2.76 ± 0.71 and 2.64 ± 0.73 lacs/mm3 by peripheral smear and automated method respectively with p value 0.4.

Conclusion: There was no significant difference between two methods, hence it proves that the two methods are same.

Key words: Platelet Count; Peripheral Smear; Automatic Analyzer


 
ARTICLE TOOLS
Abstract
PDF Fulltext
How to cite this articleHow to cite this article
Citation Tools
Related Records
 Articles by Anitha K
Articles by Inderraj Itagi
Articles by Vijayanath Itagi
on Google
on Google Scholar


REFERENCES
1. Levy JA, Murphy LD. Thrombocytopenia in Pregnancy. J Am Board Fam Pract 2002;15(4):290 -7.
2. Sibai BM. Hypertension in pregnancy. In : Gabbe SG, Niebyl JR, Simpson JL, (eds). Obstetrics: Normal and Problem of Pregnancies. 3rd Edn. New York: Churchill Livingstone. 1996. p. 935-91.
3. Cunningham FG, Gant NF, Leveno KJ, Gilstrap LC, Hauth JC, Wenstom KD. Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. In: Seilis A, Noujaim SR, Davis K, (eds). Williams Obstetrics. 21st Edn. New York : McGraw Hill. 2001. p. 567-618.
4. Malok M, Titchener EH, Bridgers C, Lee BY, Bamberg R. Comparison of two platelet count estimation methodologies for peripheral blood smears. Clin Lab Sci 2007;20(3):154-60.
5. Lotspeich-Steininer CA. Introduction to Hemostasis in Clinical Hematology: Principles, Procedures, Correlations. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams &Wilkins. 1992. p. 599-611.
6. Wyrick-Glatzel J, Hugues VC, Harmening D. Routine Hematology Methods. Philadelphia: FA Davis. 2002. p. 580.
7. Maedel LB. Examination of peripheral blood smears. In: Rodak BF, (edi). Hematology: Clinical Principles and Applications. 2nd Edi. USA : Saunders. 2002. p. 171-83.
8. Arias F. Haematological disorders in pregnancy. In: Arias F, (edi). Practical Guide to High Risk Pregnancy and Delivery. 3rd edi. Delhi: Elsevier Store. 2009. p. 475-6.
9. Sullivan CA, Martin JN, Jr. Management of the obstetric patient with thrombocytopenia. Clin obstet Gynecol 1995;38(3):521-34. [DOI via Crossref]   
10. Romero R, Mazor M, Lockwood CJ, Emamian M, Belanger KP, Hobbins JC, et al. Clinical significance, prevalence, and natural history thrombocytopenia in pregnancy-induced hypertension. Am J Perinatol 1989;6(1):32-8. [DOI via Crossref]   
11. Yin SM, Li YQ, Xie SF, Ma LP, Wu YD, Nie DN, et al. Study on the variation of platelet function in pregnancy induced hypertension and gestational diabetes mellitus” Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi 2005;40(1):25-8.
12. Lana K, Wagner MD. Diagnosis and Management of Preeclampsia. American Family Physician 2004;70(12):2317-22.
13. Bain BJ. Diagnosis from the blood smear. N Engl J Med 2005;353(4):498-507. [DOI via Crossref]   
14. Delobel J. Thrombopenies ('exception des purpuras thrombopeniques idiopathiques et des purpuras thrombotiques thrombocytopeniques). In: Laffont A, Durieux F, (eds). Encyclopedie Medico Chirurgicale: Traite d'Hematologie (sang). Paris, France: Editions Thechnique. 1997. p. 13-20.
15. Trzeciak MC, Bordet JC. Exploration de I'hemostase primaire. In: Laffont A, Durieux F, (eds). Encyclopedie Medico-Chirurgicale: Hematologie. Paris, France: Editions Scientiques et Medicales Elsevier SAS. 2002. p. 13-9.
16. Charie LA, Harrison P, Smith CU, Cobb JR, Briggs C, Machin S. Accuracy in the low platelet count range: a comparison of automated platelet counts on Beckman Coulter high-volume hematology analyzers with the ISLH/ICSH platelet reference method. Lab Hematol 2001;7:236-44.
17. Rowan RM. Platelet counting and the assessment of platelet function. In: Koepke JA, editor. Practical Laboratory Hematology. New York, NY: Churchill Livingston. 1991. p. 157-70.
18. Brahimi M, Osmani S, Arabi A, Enta-Soltan B, Taghezout Z, Elkahili BS, et al. The estimation of platelet count from a blood smear on the basis of the red cell: platelet ratio. Turk J Hematol 2009;26:21-4.
19. Jenicek M, Cleroux R. Epidemiologie (Principles, Techniques, Applications). 3rd edi. Quebec, Canada: Edisem Inc. 1983.
20. Jobin F. L’hémostase. Québec, Paris: Presses Université Laval, Editions Maloine; 1995. p. 496.
21. Malok M, Titchener EH, Bridgers C, Lee BY, Bamberg R. Comparison of two platelet count estimation methodologies for peripheral blood smears. Clin Lab Sci 2007;20(3):154-60.

This Article Cited By the following articles

Platelet counts in women with normal pregnancies: A systematic review
Am J Hematol 2017; (): .

1
 
How to Cite this Article
Pubmed Style

Anitha K, Inderraj Itagi, Vijayanath Itagi. Comparison of platelet count by peripheral smear method and automated method in pregnant women. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2014; 4(1): 39-42. doi:10.5455/njppp.2014.4.040720131


Web Style

Anitha K, Inderraj Itagi, Vijayanath Itagi. Comparison of platelet count by peripheral smear method and automated method in pregnant women. http://www.njppp.com/?mno=38236 [Access: January 03, 2022]. doi:10.5455/njppp.2014.4.040720131


AMA (American Medical Association) Style

Anitha K, Inderraj Itagi, Vijayanath Itagi. Comparison of platelet count by peripheral smear method and automated method in pregnant women. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2014; 4(1): 39-42. doi:10.5455/njppp.2014.4.040720131



Vancouver/ICMJE Style

Anitha K, Inderraj Itagi, Vijayanath Itagi. Comparison of platelet count by peripheral smear method and automated method in pregnant women. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. (2014), [cited January 03, 2022]; 4(1): 39-42. doi:10.5455/njppp.2014.4.040720131



Harvard Style

Anitha K, Inderraj Itagi, Vijayanath Itagi (2014) Comparison of platelet count by peripheral smear method and automated method in pregnant women. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol, 4 (1), 39-42. doi:10.5455/njppp.2014.4.040720131



Turabian Style

Anitha K, Inderraj Itagi, Vijayanath Itagi. 2014. Comparison of platelet count by peripheral smear method and automated method in pregnant women. National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 4 (1), 39-42. doi:10.5455/njppp.2014.4.040720131



Chicago Style

Anitha K, Inderraj Itagi, Vijayanath Itagi. "Comparison of platelet count by peripheral smear method and automated method in pregnant women." National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology 4 (2014), 39-42. doi:10.5455/njppp.2014.4.040720131



MLA (The Modern Language Association) Style

Anitha K, Inderraj Itagi, Vijayanath Itagi. "Comparison of platelet count by peripheral smear method and automated method in pregnant women." National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology 4.1 (2014), 39-42. Print. doi:10.5455/njppp.2014.4.040720131



APA (American Psychological Association) Style

Anitha K, Inderraj Itagi, Vijayanath Itagi (2014) Comparison of platelet count by peripheral smear method and automated method in pregnant women. National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 4 (1), 39-42. doi:10.5455/njppp.2014.4.040720131