Perception of students and teachers of a good lecture: A questionnaire-based cross-sectional study in a tertiary care teaching hospital

Dnyaneshwar G Kurle; Sumit G Goyal; Shirish S Joshi; Kritarth Naman M Singh; Pankaj V Sarkate

doi:10.5455/njppp.2018.8.0833512102017

2024, Vol: 14, Issue: 4

14 / 4Current Issue Online First Archive Aims and Scope Abstracting & Indexing Most Accessed Articles Most Downloaded Articles Most Cited Articles

Required files to be uploaded

Authorship Declaration

« Previous Article

Original Research

Online Publishing Date:
23 / 11 / 2017

Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2018; 8(3): 406-411

doi: 10.5455/njppp.2018.8.0833512102017

Perception of students and teachers of a good lecture: A questionnaire-based cross-sectional study in a tertiary care teaching hospital

Dnyaneshwar G Kurle, Sumit G Goyal, Shirish S Joshi, Kritarth Naman M Singh, Pankaj V Sarkate.

Abstract
Background: Lecture is still a common method for mass instruction amidst the multiple new ways, but there is a paucity of data regarding what constitutes a good lecture.

Aims and Objectives: The study was conducted to obtain the viewpoints of both the students and the teachers about lectures and find ways of improvement.

Materials and Methods: A questionnaire-based cross-sectional study was conducted involving 50 2nd year MBBS students and 50 teachers. The questionnaire consisted of 17 questions which covered various aspects of a lecture.

Results: Almost three-fourth of students and teachers thought that lecture program be displayed 1 month prior. Most participants wanted the lectures to be conducted between 8 am and 12 pm, and a number of lectures should be restricted to 3 per day. About 86% of students and 96% of teachers agreed that there should be emphasis on basics of the subject. 90% of students and 72% of teachers said that MCQs be included in the lecture. According to the majority, PowerPoint should be used for lecture, duration of which should be 45 min and overextension should be avoided. The level of understanding can be judged by directly asking questions to students, as suggested by 62% of students and 78% of teachers. The majority felt that lecture should start with a revision of previous topic and end with a summary.

Conclusion: Expectations of students about lecture should be taken into account while preparing to make it more effective teaching tool.

Key words: Feedback; Medical Education; Didactic Teaching; PowerPoint

	ARTICLE TOOLS
	Abstract
	PDF Fulltext
	How to cite this article
	Citation Tools
	Related Records
	Articles by Dnyaneshwar G Kurle Articles by Sumit G Goyal Articles by Shirish S Joshi Articles by Kritarth Naman M Singh Articles by Pankaj V Sarkate
	on Google
	on Google Scholar

How to Cite this Article

Pubmed Style

Dnyaneshwar G Kurle, Sumit G Goyal, Shirish S Joshi, Kritarth Naman M Singh, Pankaj V Sarkate. Perception of students and teachers of a good lecture: A questionnaire-based cross-sectional study in a tertiary care teaching hospital. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2018; 8(3): 406-411. doi:10.5455/njppp.2018.8.0833512102017

Web Style

Dnyaneshwar G Kurle, Sumit G Goyal, Shirish S Joshi, Kritarth Naman M Singh, Pankaj V Sarkate. Perception of students and teachers of a good lecture: A questionnaire-based cross-sectional study in a tertiary care teaching hospital. https://www.njppp.com/?mno=276499 [Access: March 14, 2024]. doi:10.5455/njppp.2018.8.0833512102017

AMA (American Medical Association) Style

Dnyaneshwar G Kurle, Sumit G Goyal, Shirish S Joshi, Kritarth Naman M Singh, Pankaj V Sarkate. Perception of students and teachers of a good lecture: A questionnaire-based cross-sectional study in a tertiary care teaching hospital. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2018; 8(3): 406-411. doi:10.5455/njppp.2018.8.0833512102017

Vancouver/ICMJE Style

Dnyaneshwar G Kurle, Sumit G Goyal, Shirish S Joshi, Kritarth Naman M Singh, Pankaj V Sarkate. Perception of students and teachers of a good lecture: A questionnaire-based cross-sectional study in a tertiary care teaching hospital. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. (2018), [cited March 14, 2024]; 8(3): 406-411. doi:10.5455/njppp.2018.8.0833512102017

Harvard Style

Dnyaneshwar G Kurle, Sumit G Goyal, Shirish S Joshi, Kritarth Naman M Singh, Pankaj V Sarkate (2018) Perception of students and teachers of a good lecture: A questionnaire-based cross-sectional study in a tertiary care teaching hospital. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol, 8 (3), 406-411. doi:10.5455/njppp.2018.8.0833512102017

Turabian Style

Dnyaneshwar G Kurle, Sumit G Goyal, Shirish S Joshi, Kritarth Naman M Singh, Pankaj V Sarkate. 2018. Perception of students and teachers of a good lecture: A questionnaire-based cross-sectional study in a tertiary care teaching hospital. National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 8 (3), 406-411. doi:10.5455/njppp.2018.8.0833512102017

Chicago Style

Dnyaneshwar G Kurle, Sumit G Goyal, Shirish S Joshi, Kritarth Naman M Singh, Pankaj V Sarkate. "Perception of students and teachers of a good lecture: A questionnaire-based cross-sectional study in a tertiary care teaching hospital." National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology 8 (2018), 406-411. doi:10.5455/njppp.2018.8.0833512102017

MLA (The Modern Language Association) Style

Dnyaneshwar G Kurle, Sumit G Goyal, Shirish S Joshi, Kritarth Naman M Singh, Pankaj V Sarkate. "Perception of students and teachers of a good lecture: A questionnaire-based cross-sectional study in a tertiary care teaching hospital." National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology 8.3 (2018), 406-411. Print. doi:10.5455/njppp.2018.8.0833512102017

APA (American Psychological Association) Style

Dnyaneshwar G Kurle, Sumit G Goyal, Shirish S Joshi, Kritarth Naman M Singh, Pankaj V Sarkate (2018) Perception of students and teachers of a good lecture: A questionnaire-based cross-sectional study in a tertiary care teaching hospital. National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 8 (3), 406-411. doi:10.5455/njppp.2018.8.0833512102017

Author Login Reviewer Login About Publisher Editorial Policies Editorial Review Policy Peer Review Policy Editorial & Peer Review Process Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice Statement Conflict of Interest Policy Plagiarism Policy Protection of Research Participants (Statement On Human And Animal Rights)Corrections, Retractions & Expressions of Concern Self-Archiving Policies Statement of Informed Consent Advertising Policy Terms of Use License Information Copyright Information

About National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology

Contact Information

How to cite this article


About National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology is a monthly peer reviewed journal. The journal is having open access polic ... Read more. For best results, please use Internet Explorer or Google Chrome.	Contact Information Publisher publishernjppp@gmail.com Editorial query editornjppp1@gmail.com MOB - 8780040272