E-ISSN 2231-3206 | ISSN 2320-4672
 
2024, Vol: 14, Issue: 4
14 / 4Current Issue Online FirstArchiveAims and ScopeAbstracting & IndexingMost Accessed ArticlesMost Downloaded ArticlesMost Cited Articles
Required files to be uploaded

Authorship Declaration

Original Research

Online Publishing Date:
04 / 12 / 2017

 


A cross-sectional analytical study on the influence of age in the precision and accuracy of non-invasive blood pressure recording compared to invasive intra-arterial pressure recording

Ramanathan Sobana, Srinivasan Parthasarathy, Trakroo Madanmohan, Balasubramaniam Amirthaganesh, Krishnan Jaiganesh.


Abstract
Background: Even after 115 years after the invention of Riva-Rocci Sphygmomanometer, the technique which shows the maximal accuracy of blood pressure (BP) measurement remains elusive. Currently, non-invasive BP (NIBP) recording is commonly done worldwide. Yet, intra-arterial pressure (IAP) recording gives a beat to beat accurate recording of one’s BP.

Aims and Objectives: The aims of this study are as follows: (1) To compare NIBP with IAP in various age groups and (2) to study the influence of age in the accuracy of NIBP recording.

Materials and Methods: A total of 98 patients aged 30–75 years posted for a coronary angiogram (CAG) were recruited for the study and divided into 3 groups based on age (Group I 30–45, Group II 46–60, and Group III 61–75). Two sets of NIBP and corresponding IAP (radial and aortic arterial pressures) were recorded during CAG. Paired t-test to compare the NIBP with corresponding IAP and ANOVA with post-hoc Bonferroni to check the influence of age with the accuracy of recording were done.

Results: NIBP differed significantly with the corresponding IAP when analyzed by paired t-test (P < 0.0001). Multiple comparisons between three age groups and the pressure difference by ANOVA were done. Age Groups I and III (30–45 years and 61–75 years) both systolic NIBPI versus radial artery pressure (P = 0.013) as well as diastolic NIBP II versus arterial blood pressure (ABP) (P = 0.053) pressure comparison were widely different. Age Groups II (46–60 years) and III (61–70 years) varied in the diastolic NIBPII versus ABP comparison with P = 0.050. The results thus indicate that there is discrepancy of manual BP versus IAP with an increasing trend with the advancement of age.

Conclusion: Thus, the results indicate that there is a discrepancy of NIBP versus IAP with NIBP showing higher values which widens with advancing age.

Key words: Non-invasive Blood Pressure; Intra-arterial Pressure; Blood Pressure Recording; Aging


 
ARTICLE TOOLS
Abstract
PDF Fulltext
How to cite this articleHow to cite this article
Citation Tools
Related Records
 Articles by Ramanathan Sobana
Articles by Srinivasan Parthasarathy
Articles by Trakroo Madanmohan
Articles by Balasubramaniam Amirthaganesh
Articles by Krishnan Jaiganesh
on Google
on Google Scholar


How to Cite this Article
Pubmed Style

Ramanathan Sobana, Srinivasan Parthasarathy, Trakroo Madanmohan, Balasubramaniam Amirthaganesh, Krishnan Jaiganesh. A cross-sectional analytical study on the influence of age in the precision and accuracy of non-invasive blood pressure recording compared to invasive intra-arterial pressure recording. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2018; 8(3): 436-440. doi:10.5455/ijmsph.2018.1039720102017

Web Style

Ramanathan Sobana, Srinivasan Parthasarathy, Trakroo Madanmohan, Balasubramaniam Amirthaganesh, Krishnan Jaiganesh. A cross-sectional analytical study on the influence of age in the precision and accuracy of non-invasive blood pressure recording compared to invasive intra-arterial pressure recording. https://www.njppp.com/?mno=279618 [Access: March 15, 2024]. doi:10.5455/ijmsph.2018.1039720102017

AMA (American Medical Association) Style

Ramanathan Sobana, Srinivasan Parthasarathy, Trakroo Madanmohan, Balasubramaniam Amirthaganesh, Krishnan Jaiganesh. A cross-sectional analytical study on the influence of age in the precision and accuracy of non-invasive blood pressure recording compared to invasive intra-arterial pressure recording. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2018; 8(3): 436-440. doi:10.5455/ijmsph.2018.1039720102017


Vancouver/ICMJE Style

Ramanathan Sobana, Srinivasan Parthasarathy, Trakroo Madanmohan, Balasubramaniam Amirthaganesh, Krishnan Jaiganesh. A cross-sectional analytical study on the influence of age in the precision and accuracy of non-invasive blood pressure recording compared to invasive intra-arterial pressure recording. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. (2018), [cited March 15, 2024]; 8(3): 436-440. doi:10.5455/ijmsph.2018.1039720102017


Harvard Style

Ramanathan Sobana, Srinivasan Parthasarathy, Trakroo Madanmohan, Balasubramaniam Amirthaganesh, Krishnan Jaiganesh (2018) A cross-sectional analytical study on the influence of age in the precision and accuracy of non-invasive blood pressure recording compared to invasive intra-arterial pressure recording. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol, 8 (3), 436-440. doi:10.5455/ijmsph.2018.1039720102017


Turabian Style

Ramanathan Sobana, Srinivasan Parthasarathy, Trakroo Madanmohan, Balasubramaniam Amirthaganesh, Krishnan Jaiganesh. 2018. A cross-sectional analytical study on the influence of age in the precision and accuracy of non-invasive blood pressure recording compared to invasive intra-arterial pressure recording. National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 8 (3), 436-440. doi:10.5455/ijmsph.2018.1039720102017


Chicago Style

Ramanathan Sobana, Srinivasan Parthasarathy, Trakroo Madanmohan, Balasubramaniam Amirthaganesh, Krishnan Jaiganesh. "A cross-sectional analytical study on the influence of age in the precision and accuracy of non-invasive blood pressure recording compared to invasive intra-arterial pressure recording." National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology 8 (2018), 436-440. doi:10.5455/ijmsph.2018.1039720102017


MLA (The Modern Language Association) Style

Ramanathan Sobana, Srinivasan Parthasarathy, Trakroo Madanmohan, Balasubramaniam Amirthaganesh, Krishnan Jaiganesh. "A cross-sectional analytical study on the influence of age in the precision and accuracy of non-invasive blood pressure recording compared to invasive intra-arterial pressure recording." National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology 8.3 (2018), 436-440. Print. doi:10.5455/ijmsph.2018.1039720102017


APA (American Psychological Association) Style

Ramanathan Sobana, Srinivasan Parthasarathy, Trakroo Madanmohan, Balasubramaniam Amirthaganesh, Krishnan Jaiganesh (2018) A cross-sectional analytical study on the influence of age in the precision and accuracy of non-invasive blood pressure recording compared to invasive intra-arterial pressure recording. National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 8 (3), 436-440. doi:10.5455/ijmsph.2018.1039720102017


Author LoginReviewer LoginAbout PublisherEditorial PoliciesEditorial Review PolicyPeer Review PolicyEditorial & Peer Review ProcessPublication Ethics and Publication Malpractice StatementConflict of Interest PolicyPlagiarism PolicyProtection of Research Participants (Statement On Human And Animal Rights)Corrections, Retractions & Expressions of ConcernSelf-Archiving PoliciesStatement of Informed ConsentAdvertising PolicyTerms of UseLicense InformationCopyright Information

About National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology

  National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology is a monthly peer reviewed journal.  The journal is having open access polic ... Read more.



For best results, please use Internet Explorer or Google Chrome.

Contact Information


Publisher

publishernjppp@gmail.com

 

Editorial query

editornjppp1@gmail.com

MOB - 8780040272