E-ISSN 2231-3206 | ISSN 2320-4672
 

Original Research 


A study to analyze the prevalence of nervous anastomosis (Martin–Gruber) in medical students

Nilesh N Kate, Chandrika G Teli, Ratnesh Gajbhiye, Kondam Ambareesha, M Suresh.

Cited by (6)

Abstract
Background: In nerve conduction laboratory, various types of cases are encountered. These are generally referred for electrophysiological investigation of the most common syndromes such as carpel tunnel syndrome where there is partial or total sparing of the thenar muscles from the effect of compression of their nerve supply. So for the assessment of traumatic and entrapment lesions of median and ulnar nerves, the knowledge of these anastomosis is important.

Aims and Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence of this anastomosis in healthy individuals, to draw attention of clinicians or surgeons from neurophysiology field to this anastomosis, and to avoid misinterpretations of different studies of needle electromyography and other nerve conduction studies.

Materials and Methods: A total of 150 healthy volunteers were selected from the medical students aged 17–30 years. Surface recording electrodes were placed on the hand abductor pollicis brevis, abductor digiti minimi, and the first dorsal interossei (FDI) of each subject. Using surface electrodes, we percutaneously stimulated the median and ulnar nerves at the wrist and the elbow. Rectangular pulses of 0.2 ms duration were used and the stimulus strength was supramaximal. Compound muscle action potential (CMAP) was recorded. CMAP from the FDI, hypothenar, and thenar muscles larger (at least 1.0 mV) on median nerve stimulation at the elbow than at the wrist and that from one or more of these sites larger (at least 1.0 mV) on stimulation of ulnar nerve at the wrist than at the elbow were accepted as indicators of the presence of the MGA. Analysis was carried out using Statistical Package for Social Sciences, version 10.0. P-value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Results: The type of anastomosis frequently observed was type II, which was observed in 12 subjects; type I was observed in 3; type I + II was observed in 2; and type III was observed in 1 subject.

Conclusion: Because of its high incidence and different electrodiagnostic considerations, MGA should be considered to be of great clinical significance for correct diagnosis and for planning appropriate therapy in peripheral lesions of median and ulnar nerves.

Key words: Compound Muscle Action Potential; Median Nerve; Ulnar Nerve; Martin–Gruber Anastomosis


 
ARTICLE TOOLS
Abstract
PDF Fulltext
How to cite this articleHow to cite this article
Citation Tools
Related Records
 Articles by Nilesh N Kate
Articles by Chandrika G Teli
Articles by Ratnesh Gajbhiye
Articles by Kondam Ambareesha
Articles by M Suresh
on Google
on Google Scholar


REFERENCES
1. Oh SJ. Clinical Electromyography. Nerve Conduction Studies. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 1993. pp. 314-33.
2. Gutmann L. AAEM minimonograph #2: important anomalous innervations of the extremities. Muscle Nerve. 1993;16:339-47. [DOI via Crossref]    [Pubmed]   
3. Uchida Y, Sugioka Y. Electrodiagnosis of Martin-Gruber connection and its clinical importance in peripheral nerve surgery. J Hand Surg. 1992;17A:54-9. [DOI via Crossref]   
4. Sarikcioglu L, Demirel BM. Martin-Gruber and Marinacci communications—anatomic or physiologic consideration. J Hist Neurosci. 2006;15:99-101. [DOI via Crossref]    [Pubmed]   
5. Erdem HR, Ergun S, Erturk C, Ozel S. Electrophysiological evaluation of the incidence of Martin-Gruber anastomosis in healthy subjects. Yonsei Med J. 2002;43:291-5. [DOI via Crossref]    [Pubmed]   
6. Sarikcioglu L, Sindel M, Ozkaynak S, Aydin H. Median and ulnar nerve communication in the forearm: a anatomical and electrophysiological study. Med Sci Monit. 2003;9:351-6.
7. Crutchfield CA, Gutmann L. Hereditary aspects of median-ulnar nerve communications. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1980;43:53-5. [DOI via Crossref]   
8. Lee KS, Oh CS, Chung IH, Sunwoo IN. An anatomic study of the Martin-Gruber anastomosis: electrodiagnostic implications. Muscle Nerve. 2005;31:95-7. [DOI via Crossref]    [Pubmed]   
9. Nakashima T. An anatomic study on the Martin-Gruber anastomosis. Surg Radiol Anat. 1993;15:193-5. [DOI via Crossref]    [Pubmed]   
10. Taams KO. Martin Gruber connections in South Africa. J Hand Surg. 1997;22B:328-30. [DOI via Crossref]   
11. Kawashima T, Sato K, Sasaki H. Stratification of the flexor retinaculum and the course and distribution of the ulnar, median and palmar digital nerves: an anatomical study. Clin Anat. 2004;17:643-50. [DOI via Crossref]    [Pubmed]   
12. Shu HS, Chantelot C, Oberlin C, Alnot JY, Shao H. Martin-Gruber communicating branch: anatomical and histological study. Surg Radiol Anat. 1999;21:115-18. [DOI via Crossref]    [Pubmed]   
13. Rodriguez-Niedenfuhr M, Vazquez T, Parkin I, Logan B, Sanudo JR. Martin-Gruber anastomosis revisited. Clin Anat. 2002;15:129-34. [DOI via Crossref]    [Pubmed]   
14. Srinivasan R, Rhodes J. The median-ulnar anastomosis (Martin- Gruber) in normal and congenitally abnormal fetuses. Arch Neurol. 1981;38:418-19. [DOI via Crossref]    [Pubmed]   
15. Brandsma JW, Birke JA, Sims DS Jr. The Martin-Gruber innervated hand. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1986;11:536-9. [DOI via Crossref]   
16. Rodriguez-Niedenfuhr M, Vazquez T, Ferreira B, Parkin I, Nearn L, Sanudo JR. Intramuscular Martin-Gruber anastomosis. Clin Anat. 2002;15:135-8. [DOI via Crossref]    [Pubmed]   
17. Amoiridis G. Median-ulnar nerve communications and anomalous innervation of the intrinsic hand muscles: an electrophysiological study. Muscle Nerve. 1992;15:576-9. [DOI via Crossref]    [Pubmed]   
18. Uchida Y, Sugiota Y. Electrodiagnosis of Martin-Gruber anastomosis. J Hand Surg. 1992;17:47-53.
19. Wilbourn AJ, Lambert EH. The forearm median-to-ulnar nerve communication: electrodiagnostic aspects. Neurology. 1976;26:368.
20. Van Tieghen J, Vandendriessche G, Vanhecke J. Martin-Gruber anastomosis: the explanation for late diagnosis of severe ulnar nerve lesions at the elbow. Electromyogr. Clin Neurophysiol. 1987;27:13-18.
21. Gutmann L. Median-ulnar nerve communications and carpal tunnel syndrome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1977;40:982-6. [DOI via Crossref]    [Pubmed]    [PMC Free Fulltext]   
22. Lambert EH. Diagnostic value of electrical stimulation of motor nerves. EEG Clinical neurophysiology. 1962;22(Suppl):9-16.
23. Iyer V, Fenichel GM. Normal median nerve proximal latency in carpel tunnel syndrome: a clue to coexisting Martin-Gruber anastomosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1976;39:449-52. [DOI via Crossref]    [Pubmed]    [PMC Free Fulltext]   
24. Kimura J. Collision technique. Neurology. 1976;26:680-2. [DOI via Crossref]    [Pubmed]   
25. Almeida JA, Vitti M, Garbino JA. Estudo anatômico da anastomose de Martin-Gruber. Hansen Int. 1999;24:15-20.
26. Gruber W. Über die Verbindung des Nervus medianus mit dem Nervus ulnaris am Untearm des Menschen und der Säugetiere. Arch Anat Physiol. 1870;37:501-22.
27. Hirasawa K. Untersuchungen uber das periphere Nervensystem, Plexus brachialis und die Nerven der oberen Extremitäten. Arb Anat Inst Kaiserlichen. 1931;2:135-7.
28. Mannerfelt L. Studies on the hand in ulnar nerve paralysis. A clinical-experimental investigation in normal and anomalous innervation. Acta Orthop Scand 87(Suppl):23-6. [DOI via Crossref]   
29. Ohkubo K, Itami Y, Murota K, Fujii K, Morita S, Kato S. Anatomical study of anastomosis between the median and ulnar nerves in the forearm (Martin-Gruber). Orthop Surg. 1976;27: 1244-8.
30. Thomson A. Third annual report of the committee of collective investigation of the Anatomical Society of Great Britain and Ireland. J Anat. 1983;27:183-94.
31. Leibovic SJ, Hastings H. Martin-Gruber revisited. J Hand Surg. 1992;17A:47-53. [DOI via Crossref]   
32. Simonetti S, Krarup C. Unusual ulnar sensory innervation and Martin-Gruber anastomosis in a patient with a carpal tunnel syndrome. J Neurol. 2000;247:141-2. [DOI via Crossref]    [Pubmed]   
33. Stancic MF, Burgic N, Micovic V. Marinacci communication. J Neurosurg. 2000;92:860-2. [DOI via Crossref]    [Pubmed]   
34. Kimura I, Ayyar DR, Lippmann SM. Electrophysiological verification of the ulnar to median nerve communications in the hand and forearm. Tohoku J Exp Med. 1983;141:269-74. [DOI via Crossref]    [Pubmed]   
35. Marinacci A. The problem of unusual anomalous innervation of hand muscles: the value of electrodiagnosis in its evaluation. Bull Los Angeles Neruol Soc. 1964;29:133-42.
36. Streib EW. Ulnar-to-median nerve anastomosis in the forearm: electromyographic studies. Neurology. 1976;29:1534-7. [DOI via Crossref]   
37. Hasegawa O, Matsumoto S, Iino M, Kirigaya N, Mimura E, Wada N, et al. [Prevalence of Martin-Gruber anastomosis on motor nerve conduction studies]. No To Shinkei. 2001;53:161-4. [Pubmed]   
38. Simonetti S. Electrophysiological study of forearm sensory fiber crossover in Martin-Gruber anastomosis. Muscle Nerve. 2001; 24:380-6. [DOI via Crossref]   
39. Kayamori R. Electrodiagnosis in Martin-Gruber anastomosis. J Jpn Orthop Assoc. 1987;61:1367-72.
40. Kimura J, Murphy MJ, Varda DJ. Electrophysiological study of anomalous innervation of intrinsic hand muscles. Arch Neurol. 1976;33:842-4. [DOI via Crossref]    [Pubmed]   

This Article Cited By the following articles

Median-to-Ulnar Nerve Communication in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: An Electrophysiological Study
Neurology International 2021; 13(3): 304.

1
 
Prevalence of Martin-Gruber Anastomosis in Healthy Subjects: An Electrophysiological Study from Raigarh, Chhattisgarh
Neurol India 2021; 69(4): 950.

2
 
Electrophysiological Evaluation and Clinical Implication of Martin-Gruber Anastomosis in Healthy Subjects
J Hand Surg Asian-Pac Vol 2020; 25(01): 87.

3
 
Conexiones entre los nervios mediano-cubital por electromiografía en Lima (Perú), 2016
Revista Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología 2018; (): .

4
 
Connections between the median and ulnar nerves evidenced by electromyography in Lima, Peru, 2016
Revista Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología (English Edition) 2018; 62(6): 415.

5
 
Median and ulnar nerve anastomoses in the upper limb: A meta-analysis
Muscle Nerve 2016; 54(1): 36.

6
 
How to Cite this Article
Pubmed Style

Nilesh N Kate, Chandrika G Teli, Ratnesh Gajbhiye, Kondam Ambareesha, M Suresh. A study to analyze the prevalence of nervous anastomosis (Martin–Gruber) in medical students. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2015; 5(3): 185-189. doi:10.5455/njppp.2015.5.1207201414


Web Style

Nilesh N Kate, Chandrika G Teli, Ratnesh Gajbhiye, Kondam Ambareesha, M Suresh. A study to analyze the prevalence of nervous anastomosis (Martin–Gruber) in medical students. https://www.njppp.com/?mno=177906 [Access: June 01, 2022]. doi:10.5455/njppp.2015.5.1207201414


AMA (American Medical Association) Style

Nilesh N Kate, Chandrika G Teli, Ratnesh Gajbhiye, Kondam Ambareesha, M Suresh. A study to analyze the prevalence of nervous anastomosis (Martin–Gruber) in medical students. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2015; 5(3): 185-189. doi:10.5455/njppp.2015.5.1207201414



Vancouver/ICMJE Style

Nilesh N Kate, Chandrika G Teli, Ratnesh Gajbhiye, Kondam Ambareesha, M Suresh. A study to analyze the prevalence of nervous anastomosis (Martin–Gruber) in medical students. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. (2015), [cited June 01, 2022]; 5(3): 185-189. doi:10.5455/njppp.2015.5.1207201414



Harvard Style

Nilesh N Kate, Chandrika G Teli, Ratnesh Gajbhiye, Kondam Ambareesha, M Suresh (2015) A study to analyze the prevalence of nervous anastomosis (Martin–Gruber) in medical students. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol, 5 (3), 185-189. doi:10.5455/njppp.2015.5.1207201414



Turabian Style

Nilesh N Kate, Chandrika G Teli, Ratnesh Gajbhiye, Kondam Ambareesha, M Suresh. 2015. A study to analyze the prevalence of nervous anastomosis (Martin–Gruber) in medical students. National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 5 (3), 185-189. doi:10.5455/njppp.2015.5.1207201414



Chicago Style

Nilesh N Kate, Chandrika G Teli, Ratnesh Gajbhiye, Kondam Ambareesha, M Suresh. "A study to analyze the prevalence of nervous anastomosis (Martin–Gruber) in medical students." National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology 5 (2015), 185-189. doi:10.5455/njppp.2015.5.1207201414



MLA (The Modern Language Association) Style

Nilesh N Kate, Chandrika G Teli, Ratnesh Gajbhiye, Kondam Ambareesha, M Suresh. "A study to analyze the prevalence of nervous anastomosis (Martin–Gruber) in medical students." National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology 5.3 (2015), 185-189. Print. doi:10.5455/njppp.2015.5.1207201414



APA (American Psychological Association) Style

Nilesh N Kate, Chandrika G Teli, Ratnesh Gajbhiye, Kondam Ambareesha, M Suresh (2015) A study to analyze the prevalence of nervous anastomosis (Martin–Gruber) in medical students. National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 5 (3), 185-189. doi:10.5455/njppp.2015.5.1207201414