E-ISSN 2231-3206 | ISSN 2320-4672
| Original Research | | |
Effectiveness of “case-based learning” in physiology
Amruta S Bennal, Manohar Y Pattar, Raju H Taklikar.  |  | | | Abstract
Background: Physiology is the link between the basic sciences and medicine. Students learn human physiology by attending theory as well as practical classes. Some of the common clinical conditions such as anemia, jaundice can be discussed in the form of “case-based learning (scenarios),” which engages students in discussion.
Aims and Objective: To know the effectiveness of case-based learning in physiology among first-year medical students and their perception toward case-based learning.
Materials and Methods: Interventional study was conducted on 100 medical students, appearing for exam in the month of July and August 2015, dividing them into groups and subgroups. Pre- and Posttest were conducted for knowledge assessment and for perception questionnaire method was used, which was validated by pilot study. Results were analyzed using paired “t” test.
Result: For some of the clinical conditions, students preferred case-based learning along with regular traditional teaching and there is a highly significant increase in scores of pre- and posttest. (p value < 0.001).
Conclusion: With benefits of interactive teaching (case-based learning), this type of learning can be incorporated during teaching–learning methodologies. Key words: Case-Based Learning; Lecture; Students; Physiology
| |
|
|
| REFERENCES |
| 1. Milaat WA, El-Gamal FM. Factors affecting the use and attitude towards medical resources and educational methods in a Saudi medical school. Ann Saudi Med. 1994;14(3):209-14. | | | | 2. Bennal A, Itagi V, Taklikar RH. Role of audio-visual aids in physiology lecture. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2014;4(2):109-11. [DOI via Crossref] | | | | 3. Richardson D. Don’t dump the didactic lecture; fix it. Adv Physiol Educ. 2008;32(1):23-4. [DOI via Crossref] [Pubmed] | | | | 4. Brown G, Manogue M. AMEE Medical Education Guide No. 22: Refreshing lecturing: a guide for lectures. Med Teach. 2001; 23(3):231-44. [DOI via Crossref] [Pubmed] | | | | 5. Medical Council of India. Vision 2015. New Delhi, India: Medical Council of India, 2011. p. 12. | | | | 6. Concordia Online Education. Interactive teaching styles used in the classroom. Education Technology. November 2, 2012. | | | | 7. Steinert Y, Snell LS. Interactive lecturing: strategies for increasing participation in large group presentations. Med Teach. 1999; 21(1):37-42. [DOI via Crossref] | | | | 8. Rao SP, Dicarlo SE. Active learning of respiratory physiology improves performance on respiratory physiology examinations. Adv Physiol Edu. 2001;25(1-4):127-33. | | | | 9. Chailwant KS. Comparison of two teaching methods, structured interactive lectures and conventional lecture. Biomed Res. 2012; 23(3):363-6. | | | | 10. Butler JA. Use of teaching methods within the lecture format. Med Teach. 1992;14(1):11-25. [DOI via Crossref] [Pubmed] | | |
|
|
