E-ISSN 2231-3206 | ISSN 2320-4672
 

Original Research
Online Published: 06 Apr 2024
 


Evaluation of a pharmacovigilance workshop using a pre-test and post-test questionnaire – Retrospective audit

Veena Rani Vemuri, Sumali Sharma.


Abstract
Background: It is estimated that only 6–10% of all adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are reported. Although India is participating in the pharmacovigilance program, its reporting is still in its initial stages. It is important to sensitize health-care professionals regarding ADR reporting and pharmacovigilance helping in better reporting. Educational interventions have been widely shown to be effective at improving the rate of ADR reporting among healthcare workers.

Aims and Objectives: The primary objective of this study is to understand the knowledge of health-care professionals regarding ADR reporting and pharmacovigilance and also to know the effectiveness and outcome of the pharmacovigilance workshop.

Materials and Methods: A retrospective audit of the data obtained from the workshops conducted on pharmacovigilance over 2 days in April 2023 was conducted after obtaining the requisite permission from the Institutional Ethics Committee. The workshops were conducted by the ADR monitoring center of Terna medical college, Nerul for the health-care professionals. A questionnaire consisting of 21 questions was used during the workshop for both pre-test and post-test. The questions tested the knowledge and attitude of health-care professionals. At the end of the session, feedback was taken regarding the workshop. The data were entered into Microsoft Excel and subjected to descriptive statistics. A paired t-test was done for the pre-test and post-test scores on Microsoft Excel.

Results: In total, there were 67 participants in the workshop, 51 (76.12%) were nursing staff of different departments. Thirteen (19.4%) were duty medical officers, 1 (1.49%) was pharmacist and 2 (2.99%) were from pathology laboratory. A paired t-test was done for the pre-test and post-test marks of the participants, and the P-value was calculated to be 0.00000297 showing a statistically significant difference between the scores. About 92.53% agreed that it is important to report an ADR. About 71.64% agreed that reporting a known ADR still contributes to the system.

Conclusion: The results of the present study demonstrate that the attitude of health-care professionals is positive regarding reporting an ADR. The improvement of the knowledge of the professionals was good after the workshop. It also concludes that workshops on pharmacovigilance and ADR reporting are necessary to increase awareness among health-care professionals on pharmacovigilance. ADR reporting is important to reduce the morbidity associated with the use of medications. There is a necessity to conduct interventions in the form of more workshops regularly to improve ADR reporting.

Key words: Adverse Drug Reaction; Workshop; Pharmacovigilance; Awareness; Medication; Report


 
ARTICLE TOOLS
Abstract
PDF Fulltext
How to cite this articleHow to cite this article
Citation Tools
Related Records
 Articles by Veena Rani Vemuri
Articles by Sumali Sharma
on Google
on Google Scholar


How to Cite this Article
Pubmed Style

Vemuri VR, Sharma S. Evaluation of a pharmacovigilance workshop using a pre-test and post-test questionnaire – Retrospective audit. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2024; 14(9): 1836-1841. doi:10.5455/njppp.2024.14.03133202401042024


Web Style

Vemuri VR, Sharma S. Evaluation of a pharmacovigilance workshop using a pre-test and post-test questionnaire – Retrospective audit. https://www.njppp.com/?mno=181992 [Access: October 04, 2024]. doi:10.5455/njppp.2024.14.03133202401042024


AMA (American Medical Association) Style

Vemuri VR, Sharma S. Evaluation of a pharmacovigilance workshop using a pre-test and post-test questionnaire – Retrospective audit. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2024; 14(9): 1836-1841. doi:10.5455/njppp.2024.14.03133202401042024



Vancouver/ICMJE Style

Vemuri VR, Sharma S. Evaluation of a pharmacovigilance workshop using a pre-test and post-test questionnaire – Retrospective audit. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. (2024), [cited October 04, 2024]; 14(9): 1836-1841. doi:10.5455/njppp.2024.14.03133202401042024



Harvard Style

Vemuri, V. R. & Sharma, . S. (2024) Evaluation of a pharmacovigilance workshop using a pre-test and post-test questionnaire – Retrospective audit. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol, 14 (9), 1836-1841. doi:10.5455/njppp.2024.14.03133202401042024



Turabian Style

Vemuri, Veena Rani, and Sumali Sharma. 2024. Evaluation of a pharmacovigilance workshop using a pre-test and post-test questionnaire – Retrospective audit. National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 14 (9), 1836-1841. doi:10.5455/njppp.2024.14.03133202401042024



Chicago Style

Vemuri, Veena Rani, and Sumali Sharma. "Evaluation of a pharmacovigilance workshop using a pre-test and post-test questionnaire – Retrospective audit." National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology 14 (2024), 1836-1841. doi:10.5455/njppp.2024.14.03133202401042024



MLA (The Modern Language Association) Style

Vemuri, Veena Rani, and Sumali Sharma. "Evaluation of a pharmacovigilance workshop using a pre-test and post-test questionnaire – Retrospective audit." National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology 14.9 (2024), 1836-1841. Print. doi:10.5455/njppp.2024.14.03133202401042024



APA (American Psychological Association) Style

Vemuri, V. R. & Sharma, . S. (2024) Evaluation of a pharmacovigilance workshop using a pre-test and post-test questionnaire – Retrospective audit. National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 14 (9), 1836-1841. doi:10.5455/njppp.2024.14.03133202401042024





Most Viewed Articles
Most Accessed Articles

  • Applications of computer science in Pharmacy: An overview
    Shivraj Popat Jadhav, Komal Nikam, Anand Gandhi, Kishor Salunkhe, Narendra Shinde.
    Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2012; 2(1): 1-9
    » Abstract

  • How to calculate sample size in animal studies?
    Hitesh Shah
    Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2011; 1(1): 35-39
    » Abstract

  • Chlorhexidine:The gold standard in chemical plaque control [English]
    Setu mathur, Tanu mathur,Rahul shrivastava, Rohit khatri
    Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2011; 1(2): 45-50
    » Abstract

  • Assessment of Nutritional Status of Pregnant Women Attending the City Tebessa PMI (Algeria) [English]
    Taleb Salima, Kaibi Mounira, Deghboudj Nadjia
    Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2011; 1(2): 97-105
    » Abstract

  • Difference in pulmonary function test among the athletic and sedentary population
    ShobhaRani Vedala, Niranjan Paul, Abhay B Mane
    Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2013; 3(2): 118-123
    » Abstract » doi: 10.5455/njppp.2013.3.109-114

  • Most Downloaded
    Top Downloaded Articles

  • How to calculate sample size in animal studies?
    Hitesh Shah
    Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2011; 1(1): 35-39
    » Abstract

  • Applications of computer science in Pharmacy: An overview
    Shivraj Popat Jadhav, Komal Nikam, Anand Gandhi, Kishor Salunkhe, Narendra Shinde.
    Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2012; 2(1): 1-9
    » Abstract

  • Evaluation of potential drug-drug interaction in indoor patients of pediatric department of tertiary care hospital
    Simran Patel, Mayur Chaudhari, Nrupal Patel
    Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2019; 9(10): 1012-1016
    » Abstract » doi: 10.5455/njppp.2019.9.0725209072019

  • Chlorhexidine:The gold standard in chemical plaque control [English]
    Setu mathur, Tanu mathur,Rahul shrivastava, Rohit khatri
    Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2011; 1(2): 45-50
    » Abstract

  • Analyzing Pharmaceutical Industry [English]
    Veselin Tima Dickov, Dragan Mitrovic, Boris Milan Kuzman
    Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2011; 1(1): 1-8
    » Abstract » doi: 10.5455/njppp.2011.1.1-8

  • Most Cited Articles
    Most Cited Articles