A cross-sectional, questionnaire study to assess the feedback from second year medical students regarding competency based medical education prescribed formative assessment in pharmacology

Chethan B; Priyanka S

doi:10.5455/njppp.2023.13.104772022016102022

2024, Vol: 14, Issue: 4

14 / 4Current Issue Online First Archive Aims and Scope Abstracting & Indexing Most Accessed Articles Most Downloaded Articles Most Cited Articles

Required files to be uploaded

Authorship Declaration

« Previous Article

Original Research

Online Publishing Date:
22 / 10 / 2022

Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2023; 13(5): 991-995

doi: 10.5455/njppp.2023.13.104772022016102022

A cross-sectional, questionnaire study to assess the feedback from second year medical students regarding competency based medical education prescribed formative assessment in pharmacology

Chethan B, Priyanka S.

Abstract
Background: Formative assessment (FA) is part of the assessment process according to the new competency based medical education curriculum and is believed to improve learning. Feedback from students is an integral part of FA which, if incorporated, may help in optimizing content and application of future FAs. Hence, the current study was conducted to assess feedback from 2nd year medical students regarding FAs in Pharmacology.

Aim and Objectives: The objectives of the study were to assess the emotional impact of FA on students and to analyze their suggestions regarding FA.

Materials and Methods: A well-designed, structured, and pre-validated questionnaire was filled by consenting students who had written the FA. The responses were compiled in an excel sheet and statistically analyzed.

Results: Out of 121 students, 115 took FA and of them 100 students filled the questionnaire (Response rate 86.95%). When it comes to emotional impact, 64% students did not find these assessments burdensome and 81% were motivated to study better. When it comes to future suggestions, 100% wanted to be pre-informed. About 88% wanted a written assessment. About 75% wanted only multiple choices questions (MCQs) and 70% wanted MCQs + Essay type questions. About 65% students wanted FAs in practicals but only 36% wanted it in the same paper as theory FA.

Conclusion: FA is a good tool to enhance learning which is not a burden on students but a good motivator for better reading. Students prefer a pre-informed, written assessment with MCQs over essay type questions and want these FAs to be conducted in practical’s also but not in the same paper.

Key words: Formative Assessment; Emotional Impact; Future Suggestions

	ARTICLE TOOLS
	Abstract
	PDF Fulltext
	How to cite this article
	Citation Tools
	Related Records
	Articles by Chethan B Articles by Priyanka S
	on Google
	on Google Scholar

How to Cite this Article

Pubmed Style

B C, S P. A cross-sectional, questionnaire study to assess the feedback from second year medical students regarding competency based medical education prescribed formative assessment in pharmacology. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2023; 13(5): 991-995. doi:10.5455/njppp.2023.13.104772022016102022

Web Style

B C, S P. A cross-sectional, questionnaire study to assess the feedback from second year medical students regarding competency based medical education prescribed formative assessment in pharmacology. https://www.njppp.com/?mno=118775 [Access: March 14, 2024]. doi:10.5455/njppp.2023.13.104772022016102022

AMA (American Medical Association) Style

B C, S P. A cross-sectional, questionnaire study to assess the feedback from second year medical students regarding competency based medical education prescribed formative assessment in pharmacology. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2023; 13(5): 991-995. doi:10.5455/njppp.2023.13.104772022016102022

Vancouver/ICMJE Style

B C, S P. A cross-sectional, questionnaire study to assess the feedback from second year medical students regarding competency based medical education prescribed formative assessment in pharmacology. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. (2023), [cited March 14, 2024]; 13(5): 991-995. doi:10.5455/njppp.2023.13.104772022016102022

Harvard Style

B, C. & S, . P. (2023) A cross-sectional, questionnaire study to assess the feedback from second year medical students regarding competency based medical education prescribed formative assessment in pharmacology. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol, 13 (5), 991-995. doi:10.5455/njppp.2023.13.104772022016102022

Turabian Style

B, Chethan, and Priyanka S. 2023. A cross-sectional, questionnaire study to assess the feedback from second year medical students regarding competency based medical education prescribed formative assessment in pharmacology. National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 13 (5), 991-995. doi:10.5455/njppp.2023.13.104772022016102022

Chicago Style

B, Chethan, and Priyanka S. "A cross-sectional, questionnaire study to assess the feedback from second year medical students regarding competency based medical education prescribed formative assessment in pharmacology." National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology 13 (2023), 991-995. doi:10.5455/njppp.2023.13.104772022016102022

MLA (The Modern Language Association) Style

B, Chethan, and Priyanka S. "A cross-sectional, questionnaire study to assess the feedback from second year medical students regarding competency based medical education prescribed formative assessment in pharmacology." National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology 13.5 (2023), 991-995. Print. doi:10.5455/njppp.2023.13.104772022016102022

APA (American Psychological Association) Style

B, C. & S, . P. (2023) A cross-sectional, questionnaire study to assess the feedback from second year medical students regarding competency based medical education prescribed formative assessment in pharmacology. National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 13 (5), 991-995. doi:10.5455/njppp.2023.13.104772022016102022

Author Login Reviewer Login About Publisher Editorial Policies Editorial Review Policy Peer Review Policy Editorial & Peer Review Process Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice Statement Conflict of Interest Policy Plagiarism Policy Protection of Research Participants (Statement On Human And Animal Rights)Corrections, Retractions & Expressions of Concern Self-Archiving Policies Statement of Informed Consent Advertising Policy Terms of Use License Information Copyright Information

About National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology

Contact Information

How to cite this article


About National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology is a monthly peer reviewed journal. The journal is having open access polic ... Read more. For best results, please use Internet Explorer or Google Chrome.	Contact Information Publisher publishernjppp@gmail.com Editorial query editornjppp1@gmail.com MOB - 8780040272