E-ISSN 2231-3206 | ISSN 2320-4672
 

Original Research
Online Published: 23 Jun 2016
 


Prescription analysis of both H1 and H2 antihistamines among in-patients of dermatology department of a tertiary care teaching hospital in a coastal town of South India

Bhanu Prakash Kolasani, C. M. Divyashanthi, Prasanand Sasidharan, Sri Venkateswaran Kothandapany.


Cited By:6

Abstract
Background: Antihistamines are one of the commonly used drugs for treating dermatological disorders. Periodic evaluation of prescribing patterns can increase the therapeutic efficacy, decrease adverse effects, and provide feedback to prescribers.

Aims and Objectives: The objective of the present study was to evaluate the prescribing pattern of both H1 and H2 antihistamines in in-patients of dermatology department in a tertiary care teaching hospital.

Materials and Methods: A prospective observational study was carried out in the Department of Dermatology of Vinayaka Missions Medical College and Hospital, Karaikal. A total of 291 prescriptions belonging to in-patients of dermatology department were scrutinized during the study period. Patient’s age, sex, and pattern of skin diseases reported and trends in antihistaminic drug usage as monotherapy or as combinations were analyzed. Most common adverse effects of the prescribed antihistamines were graded, and data were expressed as absolute numbers and percentages.

Results: Out of the total 291 prescriptions screened, 213 (73.2%) contained at least one antihistaminic drug. The majority of patients were in the age group of 41-50 years (26.83%) followed by 31-40 years (22.36%). Psoriasis, eczema, and allergic contact dermatitis were the top three disorders for which antihistamines were prescribed. Overall second-generation H1 antihistamines were prescribed more commonly than their first-generation counterparts. The most commonly prescribed antihistamine as monotherapy was cetirizine (59.62%) and combination was pheniramine + cetirizine (16.43%). H2 blockers were prescribed to 91 patients (42.7%), ranitidine being the one and only H2 blocker prescribed.

Conclusion: Secondgeneration antihistamines were more commonly prescribed compared to first-generation drugs. Cetirizine was the most commonly prescribed antihistamine, and pheniramine + cetirizine was the most prescribed combination. A substantial number of patients were prescribed H2 blockers also which indicates the higher proportion of resistant dermatological conditions.

Key words: Cetirizine; H2 Blockers; Pheniramine; Psoriasis; Second-generation Antihistamines


 
ARTICLE TOOLS
Abstract
PDF Fulltext
How to cite this articleHow to cite this article
Citation Tools
Related Records
 Articles by Bhanu Prakash Kolasani
Articles by C. M. Divyashanthi
Articles by Prasanand Sasidharan
Articles by Sri Venkateswaran Kothandapany
on Google
on Google Scholar


How to Cite this Article
Pubmed Style

Kolasani BP, Divyashanthi CM, Sasidharan P, Kothandapany SV. Prescription analysis of both H1 and H2 antihistamines among in-patients of dermatology department of a tertiary care teaching hospital in a coastal town of South India. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2016; 6(6): 537-543. doi:10.5455/njppp.2016.6.0513610062016


Web Style

Kolasani BP, Divyashanthi CM, Sasidharan P, Kothandapany SV. Prescription analysis of both H1 and H2 antihistamines among in-patients of dermatology department of a tertiary care teaching hospital in a coastal town of South India. https://www.njppp.com/?mno=229526 [Access: June 26, 2026]. doi:10.5455/njppp.2016.6.0513610062016


AMA (American Medical Association) Style

Kolasani BP, Divyashanthi CM, Sasidharan P, Kothandapany SV. Prescription analysis of both H1 and H2 antihistamines among in-patients of dermatology department of a tertiary care teaching hospital in a coastal town of South India. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2016; 6(6): 537-543. doi:10.5455/njppp.2016.6.0513610062016



Vancouver/ICMJE Style

Kolasani BP, Divyashanthi CM, Sasidharan P, Kothandapany SV. Prescription analysis of both H1 and H2 antihistamines among in-patients of dermatology department of a tertiary care teaching hospital in a coastal town of South India. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. (2016), [cited June 26, 2026]; 6(6): 537-543. doi:10.5455/njppp.2016.6.0513610062016



Harvard Style

Kolasani, B. P., Divyashanthi, . C. M., Sasidharan, . P. & Kothandapany, . S. V. (2016) Prescription analysis of both H1 and H2 antihistamines among in-patients of dermatology department of a tertiary care teaching hospital in a coastal town of South India. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol, 6 (6), 537-543. doi:10.5455/njppp.2016.6.0513610062016



Turabian Style

Kolasani, Bhanu Prakash, C. M. Divyashanthi, Prasanand Sasidharan, and Sri Venkateswaran Kothandapany. 2016. Prescription analysis of both H1 and H2 antihistamines among in-patients of dermatology department of a tertiary care teaching hospital in a coastal town of South India. National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 6 (6), 537-543. doi:10.5455/njppp.2016.6.0513610062016



Chicago Style

Kolasani, Bhanu Prakash, C. M. Divyashanthi, Prasanand Sasidharan, and Sri Venkateswaran Kothandapany. "Prescription analysis of both H1 and H2 antihistamines among in-patients of dermatology department of a tertiary care teaching hospital in a coastal town of South India." National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology 6 (2016), 537-543. doi:10.5455/njppp.2016.6.0513610062016



MLA (The Modern Language Association) Style

Kolasani, Bhanu Prakash, C. M. Divyashanthi, Prasanand Sasidharan, and Sri Venkateswaran Kothandapany. "Prescription analysis of both H1 and H2 antihistamines among in-patients of dermatology department of a tertiary care teaching hospital in a coastal town of South India." National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology 6.6 (2016), 537-543. Print. doi:10.5455/njppp.2016.6.0513610062016



APA (American Psychological Association) Style

Kolasani, B. P., Divyashanthi, . C. M., Sasidharan, . P. & Kothandapany, . S. V. (2016) Prescription analysis of both H1 and H2 antihistamines among in-patients of dermatology department of a tertiary care teaching hospital in a coastal town of South India. National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 6 (6), 537-543. doi:10.5455/njppp.2016.6.0513610062016