E-ISSN 2231-3206 | ISSN 2320-4672
 

Original Research 


A comparative study of flip classroom teaching method versus traditional classroom teaching method in undergraduate medical students in physiology

Dharmendra Dodiya, Divyesh S Vadasmiya, Jasmin Diwan.

Cited by (2)

Abstract
Background: Due to the current passive type of traditional teaching methods leads to a lack of interest in the subject by students affects teaching-learning outcome. In the flipped classroom method, we provide prior handout/teaching material to students as well there is active participation of students by various interactive methods leads subject more interesting and chances of improving teaching learning outcome.

Aims and Objectives: The aim of the study was to compare flip classroom teaching method versus traditional classroom teaching method in undergraduate medical students as well evaluate feasibility to implement a flip method in our department.

Materials and Methods: After approval from the Institutional Ethical Committee, the study conducted in 130 undergraduate medical students in the Department of Physiology at GMERS Medical College, Gandhinagar between November 2017 and January 2018. Two Groups A and B having 65 students have taken pre-test (10 marks) followed by they have undergone Group A for flip method of topic composition and functions of sympathetic nervous system and Group B for traditional method of the same topic, Group B has undergone flip method for compositions and functions of parasympathetic nervous system and Group A for traditional method for the same topic. Post-test (10 Marks) has taken immediately after the intervention. Pre-validated structured feedback was taken both from students and from faculties in 5-point Likert’s scale questionnaires.

Results: After applying paired t-test it shows the flip classroom method is statistically significant (P < 0.05) than the traditional method in both Groups. Students feedback finding shows that flip method is more enjoyable, creates interest in the subject, while faculties feedback shows it requires more time, workforce, and resources.

Conclusion: Active intervention in the form of a flip classroom method improves teaching-learning outcome as well improves overall academic performance in students compared to traditional passive teaching-learning method.

Key words: Flip Classroom; Interventional Method; Physiology, Teaching-learning


 
ARTICLE TOOLS
Abstract
PDF Fulltext
How to cite this articleHow to cite this article
Citation Tools
Related Records
 Articles by Dharmendra Dodiya
Articles by Divyesh S Vadasmiya
Articles by Jasmin Diwan
on Google
on Google Scholar


This Article Cited By the following articles

FLOWER: An Approach for Enhancing E-Learning Experience Amid COVID-19
IJERPH 2022; 19(7): 3823.

1
 
Effectiveness of interactive teaching intervention on medical students’ knowledge and attitudes toward stem cells, their therapeutic uses, and potential research applications
2022; 10(): e12824.

2
 
How to Cite this Article
Pubmed Style

Dodiya D, Vadasmiya DS, Diwan J. A comparative study of flip classroom teaching method versus traditional classroom teaching method in undergraduate medical students in physiology. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2019; 9(6): 551-555. doi:10.5455/njppp.2019.9.0310829032019


Web Style

Dodiya D, Vadasmiya DS, Diwan J. A comparative study of flip classroom teaching method versus traditional classroom teaching method in undergraduate medical students in physiology. https://www.njppp.com/?mno=38544 [Access: December 01, 2022]. doi:10.5455/njppp.2019.9.0310829032019


AMA (American Medical Association) Style

Dodiya D, Vadasmiya DS, Diwan J. A comparative study of flip classroom teaching method versus traditional classroom teaching method in undergraduate medical students in physiology. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2019; 9(6): 551-555. doi:10.5455/njppp.2019.9.0310829032019



Vancouver/ICMJE Style

Dodiya D, Vadasmiya DS, Diwan J. A comparative study of flip classroom teaching method versus traditional classroom teaching method in undergraduate medical students in physiology. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. (2019), [cited December 01, 2022]; 9(6): 551-555. doi:10.5455/njppp.2019.9.0310829032019



Harvard Style

Dodiya, D., Vadasmiya, . D. S. & Diwan, . J. (2019) A comparative study of flip classroom teaching method versus traditional classroom teaching method in undergraduate medical students in physiology. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol, 9 (6), 551-555. doi:10.5455/njppp.2019.9.0310829032019



Turabian Style

Dodiya, Dharmendra, Divyesh S Vadasmiya, and Jasmin Diwan. 2019. A comparative study of flip classroom teaching method versus traditional classroom teaching method in undergraduate medical students in physiology. National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 9 (6), 551-555. doi:10.5455/njppp.2019.9.0310829032019



Chicago Style

Dodiya, Dharmendra, Divyesh S Vadasmiya, and Jasmin Diwan. "A comparative study of flip classroom teaching method versus traditional classroom teaching method in undergraduate medical students in physiology." National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology 9 (2019), 551-555. doi:10.5455/njppp.2019.9.0310829032019



MLA (The Modern Language Association) Style

Dodiya, Dharmendra, Divyesh S Vadasmiya, and Jasmin Diwan. "A comparative study of flip classroom teaching method versus traditional classroom teaching method in undergraduate medical students in physiology." National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology 9.6 (2019), 551-555. Print. doi:10.5455/njppp.2019.9.0310829032019



APA (American Psychological Association) Style

Dodiya, D., Vadasmiya, . D. S. & Diwan, . J. (2019) A comparative study of flip classroom teaching method versus traditional classroom teaching method in undergraduate medical students in physiology. National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 9 (6), 551-555. doi:10.5455/njppp.2019.9.0310829032019