E-ISSN 2231-3206 | ISSN 2320-4672
 

Original Research

Online Publishing Date:
13 / 10 / 2022

 


Comparative study between academic performances of traditional versus competency-based medical education M.B.B.S. curriculum students in Pharmacology

Kumar Sharp, Shaikh Emaran Shaikh Ismail Teli, Harshal Mahajan, Ritesh Sonawane.


Abstract
Background: The new competency-based undergraduate curriculum (CBME) was implemented in India from the academic year 2019. However, there has been no clear-cut comparison on its effect on the academic performance of the students.

Aim and Objective: This study aims to find the comparison between students of traditional and CBME curriculum in the subject of pharmacology based on their academic parameters. It also aims to establish comparison and correlation of academic performance with gender, home place area, and mode of learning used. We also aim to determine whether objective parameters like multiple choice question (MCQ) section of preliminary examination show any correlation with final university examination performance.

Materials and Methods: This is a cross-sectional type of study. Seventy-seven students from traditional old curriculum and 98 students from CBME new curriculum batches participated with informed consent. The data for analysis between old and new curriculum batches were done using the mark obtained in final university examination in the subject of pharmacology. Quantitative parameters, that is, total marks overall, total theory marks, total marks in practical and oral viva combined, total marks in internal assessment and MCQ marks of preliminary examination, and qualitative variables such as gender of the student, home place area, that is, rural or urban and mode of learning used (physical or physical and digital) were obtained from the participants. IBM-SPSS version 25 software was used to perform descriptive statistics, independent t-tests, and Pearson’s correlation.

Results: The results clearly demonstrate that the old curriculum batch of 2018 performed better than 2019 in overall as well as practical aspects of the subject. Pearson’s correlation between all the quantitative parameters, that is, total marks overall, total theory marks, total marks in practical and oral viva combined, total marks in internal assessment, and MCQ marks of prelims for the batch of 2019 showed positive correlation with each other.

Conclusions: This study concludes that the old curriculum batch performed better than new curriculum batch in the subject of pharmacology. MCQ examination held in offline mode helps in better correlation with final university results as compared to online mode.

Key words: New Curriculum; Academic; CBME; Pharmacology; Comparison


 
ARTICLE TOOLS
Abstract
PDF Fulltext
How to cite this articleHow to cite this article
Citation Tools
Related Records
 Articles by Kumar Sharp
Articles by Shaikh Emaran Shaikh Ismail Teli
Articles by Harshal Mahajan
Articles by Ritesh Sonawane
on Google
on Google Scholar


How to Cite this Article
Pubmed Style

Sharp K, Teli SESI, Mahajan H, Sonawane R. Comparative study between academic performances of traditional versus competency-based medical education M.B.B.S. curriculum students in Pharmacology. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2023; 13(5): 971-976. doi:10.5455/njppp.2023.13.09461202202102022


Web Style

Sharp K, Teli SESI, Mahajan H, Sonawane R. Comparative study between academic performances of traditional versus competency-based medical education M.B.B.S. curriculum students in Pharmacology. https://www.njppp.com/?mno=117681 [Access: March 14, 2024]. doi:10.5455/njppp.2023.13.09461202202102022


AMA (American Medical Association) Style

Sharp K, Teli SESI, Mahajan H, Sonawane R. Comparative study between academic performances of traditional versus competency-based medical education M.B.B.S. curriculum students in Pharmacology. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2023; 13(5): 971-976. doi:10.5455/njppp.2023.13.09461202202102022



Vancouver/ICMJE Style

Sharp K, Teli SESI, Mahajan H, Sonawane R. Comparative study between academic performances of traditional versus competency-based medical education M.B.B.S. curriculum students in Pharmacology. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. (2023), [cited March 14, 2024]; 13(5): 971-976. doi:10.5455/njppp.2023.13.09461202202102022



Harvard Style

Sharp, K., Teli, . S. E. S. I., Mahajan, . H. & Sonawane, . R. (2023) Comparative study between academic performances of traditional versus competency-based medical education M.B.B.S. curriculum students in Pharmacology. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol, 13 (5), 971-976. doi:10.5455/njppp.2023.13.09461202202102022



Turabian Style

Sharp, Kumar, Shaikh Emaran Shaikh Ismail Teli, Harshal Mahajan, and Ritesh Sonawane. 2023. Comparative study between academic performances of traditional versus competency-based medical education M.B.B.S. curriculum students in Pharmacology. National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 13 (5), 971-976. doi:10.5455/njppp.2023.13.09461202202102022



Chicago Style

Sharp, Kumar, Shaikh Emaran Shaikh Ismail Teli, Harshal Mahajan, and Ritesh Sonawane. "Comparative study between academic performances of traditional versus competency-based medical education M.B.B.S. curriculum students in Pharmacology." National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology 13 (2023), 971-976. doi:10.5455/njppp.2023.13.09461202202102022



MLA (The Modern Language Association) Style

Sharp, Kumar, Shaikh Emaran Shaikh Ismail Teli, Harshal Mahajan, and Ritesh Sonawane. "Comparative study between academic performances of traditional versus competency-based medical education M.B.B.S. curriculum students in Pharmacology." National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology 13.5 (2023), 971-976. Print. doi:10.5455/njppp.2023.13.09461202202102022



APA (American Psychological Association) Style

Sharp, K., Teli, . S. E. S. I., Mahajan, . H. & Sonawane, . R. (2023) Comparative study between academic performances of traditional versus competency-based medical education M.B.B.S. curriculum students in Pharmacology. National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 13 (5), 971-976. doi:10.5455/njppp.2023.13.09461202202102022