E-ISSN 2231-3206 | ISSN 2320-4672
 

Original Research 


Beliefs and attitudes of generic versus original drugs among doctors in a tertiary-care hospital in Western India

Kanchan R Singh, Abhishek M Phatak, Mugdha A Sathe.

Cited by (2)

Abstract
Background: Physicians have a choice between original and generic drugs while prescribing to patients. The original and generic drugs are rarely studied against each other in patient population, and, hence, it is important to know how health-care providers perceive the differences between two classes of the drugs.

Aims and Objective: To analyze the beliefs, perceptions, and attitudes of health-care providers in a tertiary-care hospital toward generic and original drugs.

Materials and Methods: This is a descriptive, cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study conducted among 200 students and faculty in a tertiary-care hospital in western India. The questionnaire mainly dealt with perceptions, attitudes, and beliefs of doctors toward generic drugs in comparison with original drugs. The results were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

Result: Of 200 participants, 62% supported generic substitution for original drugs in most cases, 60 (30%) supported generic substitutions for original drugs in all cases where generics were available, and 16 (8%) did not support generic substitution for original drugs. One hundred and seventeen (58.5%) participants perceived that there was significant difference between price of generic and original brand drugs. Although 56% participants believed that generic drugs are as effective as originals, 56% participants also mentioned that they have experienced difference in the quality of generic drugs against original brand drugs.

Conclusion: This study found a gap between knowledge score and generic prescription practices, indicating that training programs for health-care providers in India to improve their knowledge about generic drugs may be necessary.

Key words: Generic; Original; Attitudes; Beliefs


 
ARTICLE TOOLS
Abstract
PDF Fulltext
How to cite this articleHow to cite this article
Citation Tools
Related Records
 Articles by Kanchan R Singh
Articles by Abhishek M Phatak
Articles by Mugdha A Sathe
on Google
on Google Scholar


REFERENCES
1. Hoffmann F, Glaeske G, Pfannkuche MS. The effect of introducing rebate contracts to promote generic drug substitution, on doctors' prescribing practices. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2009;106(48):783–8. [Pubmed]    [PMC Free Fulltext]   
2. World Health Organization. Generic Drugs. Geneva: WHO, 2016. Available at: http://www.who.int/trade/glossary/story034/en/(last accessed on January 20, 2016).
3. King DR, Kanavos P. Encouraging the use of generic medicines: implications for transition economies. Croat Med J. 2002;43(4):462–9. [Pubmed]   
4. Rodin HA, Heaton AH, Wilson AR, Garrett NA, Plocher DW. Plan designs that encourage the use of generic drugs over brand-name drugs: an analysis of a free generic benefit. Amer J Manag Care. 2009;15(12):881–8. [Pubmed]   
5. World Health Organization. The Pursuit of Responsible Use of Medicines: Sharing and Learning from Country Experiences Geneva: WHO, 2016. [Available at: http://www.who.int/medicines/areas/rational_use/en/(last accessed on January 21, 2016).
6. Sharma P, Kumar S, Pahwa R, Sharma A. Opportunities for generic drugs in India. Int J Third World Med. 2008;8(1):1–5.
7. Tata Strategic Management Group. Overview of Indian Pharmaceutical Industry, Asia Business Generator Project. Mumbai: Tata Strategic Management Group, 2016. Available at: http://www.ibpcosaka.or.jp/network/e_abg/e_india_abg_pharmacy_report200803.pdf (last accessed on January 21, 2016).
8. Chaudhari M, Charan J. Prescription of generic drugs. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2013;3(1):1–3. [DOI via Crossref]   
9. Kahook MY, Fechtner RD, Katz LJ, Noecker RJ, Ammar DA. A comparison of active ingredients and preservatives between brand name and generic topical glaucoma medications using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Curr Eye Res. 2012;37(2):101–8. [DOI via Crossref]    [Pubmed]   
10. Decollogny A1, Eggli Y, Halfon P, Lufkin TM. Determinants of generic drug substitution in Switzerland. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11:17. [DOI via Crossref]    [Pubmed]    [PMC Free Fulltext]   
11. Creative Research Calculator 2016. Sample Size Calculator Available at: http://www.surveysystem.com/sscalc.htm(last accessed on January 31, 2016).
12. Jamshed SQ, Hassali MAA, Ibrahim MIM, Babar Z u D. Knowledge attitude and perception of dispensing doctors regarding generic medicines in Karachi, Pakistan: a qualitative study. J Pak Med Assoc. 2011;61(1):80–3. [Pubmed]   
13. Hassali MA, Kong DCM, Stewart K. Generic medicines: perceptions of general practitioners in Melbourne, Australia. J Generic Med. 2006;3(3):214–25. [DOI via Crossref]   
14. Sharrad AK, Hassali MA, Shafie AA. Generic medicines: perceptions of physicians in Basrah, Iraq. Australas Med J. 2009;1(8):58–64.
15. Chua GN, Hassali MA, Shafie AA, Awaisu A. A survey exploring knowledge and perceptions of general practitioners towards the use of generic medicines in the northern state of Malaysia. Health Policy. 2010;95(2–3):229–35. [DOI via Crossref]    [Pubmed]   
16. Dickov VT, Mitrovic D, Kuzman BM. Analyzing pharmaceutical industry. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2011;1(1):1–8. [DOI via Crossref]   
17. Kingman S. Fisons investigations of excessive hospitality. Br Med J. 1993;307:1301–2. [Pubmed]   
18. Kersnik J, Peklar J. Attitudes of Slovene general practitioners towards generic drug prescribing and comparison with international studies. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2006;31(6):577–83. [DOI via Crossref]    [Pubmed]   
19. Hsu YH, Fang W, Lee Y. Ethically questionable behavior in sales representatives—an example from the Taiwanese pharmaceutical industry. J Bus Ethics. 2009;88(0):155–66. [DOI via Crossref]   
20. Komesaroff PA, Kerridge IH. Ethical issues concerning the relationships between medical practitioners and the pharmaceutical industry. Med J Aust. 2002;176:118–21. [Pubmed]   
21. Prosser H, Almond S, Walley T. Influences on GPs' decision to prescribe new drugs—the importance of who says what. Fam Pract. 2003;20(1):61–8. [DOI via Crossref]    [Pubmed]   
22. Caudill TS, Johnson MS, Rich EC, McKinney WP. Physicians, pharmaceutical sales representatives, and the cost of prescribing. Arch Fam Med. 1996;5(4):201–6. [DOI via Crossref]    [Pubmed]   
23. Rohra DK, Gilani AH, Memon IK, Perven G, Khan MT, Zafar H, et al. Critical evaluation of the claims made by pharmaceutical companies in drug promotional material in Pakistan. J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2006;9(1):50–9. [Pubmed]   
24. Carthy P, Harvey I, Brawn R, Watkins C. A study of factors associated with cost and variation in prescribing among GPs. Fam Pract. 2000;17(1):36–41. [DOI via Crossref]    [Pubmed]   
25. Peay ER, Peay MY. Differences among practitioners in patterns of preference for information sources in the adoption of new drugs. Soc Sci Med. 1984;18(12):1019–25. [DOI via Crossref]   
26. Andersson SJ, Lindberg G, Troein M. What shapes GPs' work with depressed patients? A qualitative interview study. Fam Pract. 2002;19(6):623–31. [DOI via Crossref]    [Pubmed]   

This Article Cited By the following articles

Opinion of primary care physicians regarding prescription of generic drugs: A Cross-sectional study
J Family Med Prim Care 2021; 10(3): 1390.

1
 
Generic drugs in the Middle East: A case study in Sulaimani City, Iraq
Journal of Generic Medicines 2020; (): 174113432091575.

2
 
How to Cite this Article
Pubmed Style

Kanchan R Singh, Abhishek M Phatak, Mugdha A Sathe. Beliefs and attitudes of generic versus original drugs among doctors in a tertiary-care hospital in Western India. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2016; 6(4): 276-281. doi:10.5455/njppp.2016.6.23022016127


Web Style

Kanchan R Singh, Abhishek M Phatak, Mugdha A Sathe. Beliefs and attitudes of generic versus original drugs among doctors in a tertiary-care hospital in Western India. https://www.njppp.com/?mno=219627 [Access: January 04, 2023]. doi:10.5455/njppp.2016.6.23022016127


AMA (American Medical Association) Style

Kanchan R Singh, Abhishek M Phatak, Mugdha A Sathe. Beliefs and attitudes of generic versus original drugs among doctors in a tertiary-care hospital in Western India. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2016; 6(4): 276-281. doi:10.5455/njppp.2016.6.23022016127



Vancouver/ICMJE Style

Kanchan R Singh, Abhishek M Phatak, Mugdha A Sathe. Beliefs and attitudes of generic versus original drugs among doctors in a tertiary-care hospital in Western India. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. (2016), [cited January 04, 2023]; 6(4): 276-281. doi:10.5455/njppp.2016.6.23022016127



Harvard Style

Kanchan R Singh, Abhishek M Phatak, Mugdha A Sathe (2016) Beliefs and attitudes of generic versus original drugs among doctors in a tertiary-care hospital in Western India. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol, 6 (4), 276-281. doi:10.5455/njppp.2016.6.23022016127



Turabian Style

Kanchan R Singh, Abhishek M Phatak, Mugdha A Sathe. 2016. Beliefs and attitudes of generic versus original drugs among doctors in a tertiary-care hospital in Western India. National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 6 (4), 276-281. doi:10.5455/njppp.2016.6.23022016127



Chicago Style

Kanchan R Singh, Abhishek M Phatak, Mugdha A Sathe. "Beliefs and attitudes of generic versus original drugs among doctors in a tertiary-care hospital in Western India." National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology 6 (2016), 276-281. doi:10.5455/njppp.2016.6.23022016127



MLA (The Modern Language Association) Style

Kanchan R Singh, Abhishek M Phatak, Mugdha A Sathe. "Beliefs and attitudes of generic versus original drugs among doctors in a tertiary-care hospital in Western India." National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology 6.4 (2016), 276-281. Print. doi:10.5455/njppp.2016.6.23022016127



APA (American Psychological Association) Style

Kanchan R Singh, Abhishek M Phatak, Mugdha A Sathe (2016) Beliefs and attitudes of generic versus original drugs among doctors in a tertiary-care hospital in Western India. National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 6 (4), 276-281. doi:10.5455/njppp.2016.6.23022016127