E-ISSN 2231-3206 | ISSN 2320-4672
 

Original Research
Online Published: 12 Jul 2013
 


Comparison of platelet count by peripheral smear method and automated method in pregnant women

Anitha K, Inderraj Itagi, Vijayanath Itagi.


Cited By:13

Abstract
Background: Platelet count is an important investigation done in pregnant women. Platelet count is routinely done by automated method. The automated cell counters are not available at all hospital setups especially in rural side. Platelets can also be estimated from the peripheral smears, which can be easily done at any set up.

Aims & Objective: This study was conducted to compare the platelet estimation by peripheral smear method and automated method.

Materials and Methods: Platelet estimation was done in 50 normal pregnant women by stained peripheral smear and automated method. Platelet counts were expressed in Mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was done by student’s t test.

Results: Platelet counts were 2.76 ± 0.71 and 2.64 ± 0.73 lacs/mm3 by peripheral smear and automated method respectively with p value 0.4.

Conclusion: There was no significant difference between two methods, hence it proves that the two methods are same.

Key words: Platelet Count; Peripheral Smear; Automatic Analyzer


 
ARTICLE TOOLS
Abstract
PDF Fulltext
How to cite this articleHow to cite this article
Citation Tools
Related Records
 Articles by Anitha K
Articles by Inderraj Itagi
Articles by Vijayanath Itagi
on Google
on Google Scholar


How to Cite this Article
Pubmed Style

K A, Itagi I, Itagi V. Comparison of platelet count by peripheral smear method and automated method in pregnant women. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2014; 4(1): 39-42. doi:10.5455/njppp.2014.4.040720131


Web Style

K A, Itagi I, Itagi V. Comparison of platelet count by peripheral smear method and automated method in pregnant women. https://www.njppp.com/?mno=38236 [Access: June 27, 2026]. doi:10.5455/njppp.2014.4.040720131


AMA (American Medical Association) Style

K A, Itagi I, Itagi V. Comparison of platelet count by peripheral smear method and automated method in pregnant women. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2014; 4(1): 39-42. doi:10.5455/njppp.2014.4.040720131



Vancouver/ICMJE Style

K A, Itagi I, Itagi V. Comparison of platelet count by peripheral smear method and automated method in pregnant women. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. (2014), [cited June 27, 2026]; 4(1): 39-42. doi:10.5455/njppp.2014.4.040720131



Harvard Style

K, A., Itagi, . I. & Itagi, . V. (2014) Comparison of platelet count by peripheral smear method and automated method in pregnant women. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol, 4 (1), 39-42. doi:10.5455/njppp.2014.4.040720131



Turabian Style

K, Anitha, Inderraj Itagi, and Vijayanath Itagi. 2014. Comparison of platelet count by peripheral smear method and automated method in pregnant women. National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 4 (1), 39-42. doi:10.5455/njppp.2014.4.040720131



Chicago Style

K, Anitha, Inderraj Itagi, and Vijayanath Itagi. "Comparison of platelet count by peripheral smear method and automated method in pregnant women." National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology 4 (2014), 39-42. doi:10.5455/njppp.2014.4.040720131



MLA (The Modern Language Association) Style

K, Anitha, Inderraj Itagi, and Vijayanath Itagi. "Comparison of platelet count by peripheral smear method and automated method in pregnant women." National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology 4.1 (2014), 39-42. Print. doi:10.5455/njppp.2014.4.040720131



APA (American Psychological Association) Style

K, A., Itagi, . I. & Itagi, . V. (2014) Comparison of platelet count by peripheral smear method and automated method in pregnant women. National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 4 (1), 39-42. doi:10.5455/njppp.2014.4.040720131